Currently set to Index
Currently set to Follow

Successful Transport and Warehouse OutsourcingOver the last 10-15  years, outsourcing of logistics activities to third-party logistics service providers has become increasingly popular. Research indicates that up to 75% of firms  report positive impacts from outsourcing to logistics service providers (Langley J, Capgemini 2007). But  what of the balance? Why  have they struggled to obtain the results that they were hoping for?

In this article I will outline, firstly, the reasons why organisations outsource logistics  activities, and secondly, what the key drivers are  for outsourcing success.


Why do organisations outsource logistics operations?
There are  many apparent motives why companies outsource, but from  my experience there are  four  principal reasons:


1. Warehousing and  distribution management is not a ‘core’ skill.

Peters and Waterman in their best, seller‘In Search for Excellence’ identify one of the eight factors of organisational success as ‘sticking to the knitting’. They warned that companies that stray from  their core business risk  their employees attention being diverted from that business to the point where they lose focus.

Many enterprises have taken heed and determined that inbound and outbound transport and warehousing are ‘consequential’ processes of their business rather than ‘fundamental’ or ‘core’ processes. This has fuelled growth of the third-party outsourcing industry and expansion of scores of logistics service providers.

While  many logistics service providers commenced as transport companies, they have diversified to engage in contract warehousing logistics, freight forwarding plus many other value adding services. On a world scale there are thousands of providers offering third-party services, yet  there are only  a handful of very large ones with the ability, network, systems and infrastructure needed for multinational customers.

Consider the rationalisation of major players over  the last five years in Australia alone, e.g. DHL/Exel/Tibbet and Britten, Schenker/ Bax, Toll/Patricks/Brambles/SembCorp/ Finemores, Linfox/Mayne/FCL/Westgate. The choice of which provider to use typically  depends on the local  and/or international scale of the customers and alignment with the size  and geographic spread of the logistics service provider.


2. Performance is sub-optimal.

Related to the ‘core  skill’ issue, often organisations that have a strategic focus other than in transport or warehousing, cannot attain the desired performance levels and key performance indicators (KPIs) required by their customers. For example, companies that have their own in-house vehicle fleet often struggle to deliver products on time. For instance, a service ratio of less than 98% of deliveries delivered on time is a major issue for modern consumers  as they have become far more demanding.

Merely dealing with the complexity of transport networks, contractors, inventories, industrial unions, and cost control is tough enough for many enterprises, so achieving 98% on-time performance is, for some, just a dream. On the warehousing front, checking performance against just a few industry KPIs can quickly help managers determine how effective their operations are.

Telling signs are  low  levels of inventory accuracy, low stock turns, and low order output ratios per labour hour, high levels of unexplainable losses or damage to goods, high operating costs, customer performance complaints, and high employee turnover. When these signs are  evident, firms often choose to outsource rather than waste time developing their own remedies.


3. Reduction in asset capital.Warehouses and vehicles are expensive to purchase or lease and can  tie up millions of dollars that could otherwise be invested in the core business of the firm. Consequently, there is a trend for firms  to remove warehouse assets from  the balance sheet, and redirect capital gained from  sale of assets to working capital and/or core  asset investments. In choosing to outsource, firms  can therefore transfer all of the costs of distribution to their profit and loss account. This is a blessing for third-party logistics providers, who have won large amounts of new business for this reason alone

Click here to download my free presentation

4. Flexibility and  Scalability. With the advent of e-commerce, increasing  globalisation and rationalisation of industries, today’s market place demands fast, flexible and efficient supply chains. Coupled with shorter strategic planning horizons, use of logistics service providers gives organisations flexibility to expand or change their method to market and volumes handled with almost immediate effect.

Enterprises will typically negotiate one to two year agreements with ‘termination for convenience’ exit  clauses in case they wish to change their short to medium term strategy to market. It is simply not  possible to respond quickly to market changes if there is a fully owned or leased network of warehouse and transportation assets in place.


But what about cost of service? Surprisingly cost of service, although important, is seldom a deciding factor, or driver, for outsourcing decisions.

Cost of Outsourcing ServiceWhy? Very  rarely do companies save money through merely ‘outsourcing’ warehousing and transport. They may attain savings over  a period of time, e.g. 3-5 years, but not  simply from  the ‘act’ of outsourcing. The  reason is elementary. Third-party logistics companies have to pay almost the same operating costs as other organisations (sometimes more). While they do develop purchasing power and discount rates with transport subcontractors and other vendors, there is often little disparity between the costs of a logistics service provider and their would be  customers.

Why? The  provider has to add a margin to their costs to be profitable. In my experience the profit margin can range from  7-15%. This  means that if a firm is seeking to bank savings after outsourcing, they may well be disappointed. As a rule of thumb, companies can expect to pay from  5-10% more than current costs for outsourcing.


You will recall the four  reasons for outsourcing to which cost is subservient. However, cost is a critical factor in judging the value proposition of potential providers who are quoting to do the work, and also  in their ultimate appointment. So to be  clear, cost is not a reason to outsource, but a means to assist the decision as to whom to outsource to.


What are the key drivers for success in establishing a good customer and 3PL relationship?


Strategic alignment
The  outsourcing decision must align with the company’s strategic direction. This  is ‘common sense’ statement, but unfortunately not  well practiced. Amazingly, many companies have suffered after outsourcing decisions were made at an operational level, without due regard to the board’s supply chain strategy.

Alas, in some cases, there is no supply chain strategy to speak of. This  can  cause organisational stress and is a nightmare to remedy after contracts are established. These days third- party providers are aware that their clients may be deficient in strategy formulation, so they include clauses in contracts which enable them to change pricing and perfor- mance mechanisms if a change in company strategy or method to market occurs.


Attention to detail
When seeking third-party quotations and contracts, there is no room  for intuition, or best-guesses, on order velocities, volumes, processes and service requirements. Very detailed specifications must be prepared by enterprises, with full disclosure of all available data before a quotation from  service  providers is attained.

There is rarely too much information that you can gather. But where there is an absence of sensible interpretation of data, this can cause major issues in the outsourcing relationship. On a number of occasions I have been asked to sort out problems with pricing mechanisms that are based on customer’s cost of goods sold, volume sold or per cent of revenue.

On the surface these appear to be simple pricing gauges, but often they force one party, either the customer or logistics service provider, to prosper or lose unfairly. The supply chain interactions of physical movement and electronic information is complex, and overly simple charging mechanisms deserve close scrutiny as they can lead to disputes if one or the other party decides that they are being ripped off.


Resource wisely
Both during implementation and the ongoing partnership a competent team is essential. Both the customer and the third-party logistics company must create an open and trusting working relationship. Each company’s team should include senior relationship managers from across the organisations, who meet regularly to discuss and monitor progress and performance. Too often, once an agreement is signed, implementation is left  under the stewardship of the logistics service provider.

This  is a mistake. It must be a joint exercise. The best implementations are those that have a key member of the customer on the team to lead, organise and develop the solution to full implementation with the provider. Such implementations are  usually augmented by robust project management methods to ensure that all milestones are achieved.


Raise potential issues early
From my experience issues that are not dealt with proactively and in good time can  fester into ‘relationship breakers’ and end in disaster. So both parties should take a long-term perspective and be mature in their outlook and approach, always avoiding disrespectful behaviour to the other party. It never helps if one party is kicking the other. During implementation planning phases representatives from each company should meet weekly to discuss implementation tasks. Some  may argue that this is too often, but in my experience the regularity maintains momentum and full attention to successful outcomes.


Use  KPIs to manage
The contract and agreement should be  subject  to regular reviews of KPIs. Data speaks volumes in terms of performance. For both warehousing and transport, KPIs should be agreed at the outset. Typical measures include delivery in full on time, goods lost  in transit, stock damage, ullage (unexplained loss  or damage), inventory accuracy, time to receive goods, and time to dispatch goods.

As a rule of thumb, no more than six KPIs should be used. But make sure you choose the ones that are  most meaningful to your business. In this way a focus on the ‘facts’ can  help remove ‘emotionally charged’ opinions  or feelings by either party.

Whether you are an organisation seeking to outsource, or a third-party logistics provider, by following these tips you will be equipped to enter to an outsourcing agreement that is ‘fertile for growth’ and well placed to build into a mature and successful partnership.

In my next article I will be  covering the different types of outsourcing relationships and issues to be  aware of when entering contracts.


Mal WalkerBest Regards,

Mal Walker

Email or 0412 271 503



Mal Walker is manager, consulting with the Logistics Bureau, where he  works with local and international organisations to guide them in specification preparation,  establishment and  review of outsourcing contracts. He is a life member of the Logistics Association of Australia, member of Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals and  a director of Smart Conferences. He holds qualifications in engineering, business operations and logistics.

Share This